Platform overviewCryptographic inventoryCBOMCrypto agilityPQC migrationCI drift control
All solutionsFinancial servicesGovernmentHealthcareSoftware companies
SecurityPricing
GuidesPQC migration guideNIST PQC standardsCryptographic inventoryCompareIntegrations
Start a scanSee the platformSign in

Quantum readiness assessment

A quantum readiness assessment grounded in evidence, not a single score

Qubrisk gives teams a repeatable assessment model that shows both progress and uncertainty. It avoids turning incomplete discovery into a confident readiness percentage.

Start a scan See pricing

Decision brief

Primary query
quantum readiness assessment
Best for
Teams that need reviewable cryptographic evidence, ownership, and continuous migration control.
Safety boundary
Evidence supports decisions; it is not proof of implementation safety or compliance.

A credible readiness assessment evaluates more than the count of RSA and ECC findings. It should test whether the organization can discover cryptography across relevant surfaces, connect assets to systems and data, assign owners, obtain vendor plans, run interoperability experiments, sequence migration, and prevent regression. Unknown coverage is itself a material finding.

Qubrisk records assessment evidence at the asset and program level. Leaders can see coverage, known exposure, unowned work, expiring exceptions, vendor blockers, and verification status. Engineers can trace each aggregate back to the repository, location, dependency, and decision that produced it. This makes the assessment useful as an operating baseline rather than a presentation-only report.

Capabilities

What the operating model needs to do

01

Coverage scorecard

Measure scanned, excluded, inaccessible, and unknown surfaces separately.

02

Exposure analysis

Identify observed quantum-vulnerable public-key cryptography and the systems it supports.

03

Organizational readiness

Track ownership, vendor engagement, test environments, policy, and migration capacity.

04

Evidence-backed reporting

Let stakeholders inspect the records behind every status and limitation.

Workflow

A repeatable path to evidence

Use explicit scope, accountable decisions, and verification gates. Keep unknowns visible so progress is not manufactured by narrowing the denominator.

  1. 1

    Define scope

    List systems, repositories, environments, vendors, data classes, and business units included.

  2. 2

    Collect evidence

    Run discovery and gather architecture, ownership, procurement, and vendor migration inputs.

  3. 3

    Rate dimensions

    Assess visibility, exposure, prioritization, execution capability, and continuous control independently.

  4. 4

    Create the roadmap

    Turn gaps into accountable actions, milestones, dependencies, and evidence requirements.

Expected deliverables

Artifacts the next team can inspect

  • Readiness dimension scorecard
  • Known and unknown coverage
  • Quantum-vulnerable asset register
  • Vendor and ownership gaps
  • Prioritized roadmap with evidence gates

Buyer checklist

Questions for a proof of value

  1. 01Can every score be traced to evidence?
  2. 02Does the assessment expose unknown scope?
  3. 03Are organizational and vendor dependencies included?
  4. 04Can it be rerun to measure genuine change?
  5. 05Does the method avoid promising a date for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer?

Limits and cautions

What this page does not promise

  • A readiness score is a management aid, not a security certification.
  • Assessment quality depends on honest scoping and evidence availability.
  • The objective is migration capability and reduced exposure, not prediction of quantum timelines.

Continue evaluating

Related decision pages

Cryptographic posture management

Continuous cryptographic posture management for software teams

Monitor cryptographic assets, policy drift, ownership, exceptions, and remediation evidence across the software delivery lifecycle.

Read page

Cryptography code scanner

Find cryptographic use in code without treating regex as proof

Scan source, dependencies, configuration, and containers for cryptographic assets with exact locations, confidence, redacted evidence, CBOM, and SARIF output.

Read page

Certificate inventory

Connect certificate inventory to cryptographic context and ownership

Inventory approved TLS endpoints and certificate observations alongside algorithms, protocols, repositories, owners, policy, and post-quantum migration work.

Read page

Implementation guide

How to build and maintain a cryptographic inventory

A practical guide to inventory scope, evidence, asset identity, confidence, ownership, CBOM export, continuous discovery, and migration use.

Read page
Local-first discovery

Start with evidence from one representative repository

Run a scoped scan, inspect every result, export the CBOM, and decide whether the evidence is strong enough to support your operating model.

Create a workspace